9 results for 'cat:"Patent" AND cat:"Injunction"'.
J. King grants the pet products company an injunction regarding its complaint that the store is manufacturing and selling products, including a pet hair remover, that infringe on the pet products company's patent. The pet products company shows that the store infringed on its copyright, and evidence shows that an injunction serves in the public interest as opposed to harming the public interest.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: King, Filed On: March 31, 2024, Case #: 2:20cv1768, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: Copyright, patent, injunction
J. Cole denies the Jeep hardtop cover patent holder's motion to expand the court's previous injunction, ruling the sale of two allegedly patent-infringing hardtops by the manufacturer the day the injunction was entered does not violate the order considering the time difference between this court's location in Cincinnati and Thailand, the location of the manufacturer. Meanwhile, the publication of an FAQ and assembly guide on the manufacturer's website does not constitute a violation of the injunction, which prohibits any advertising, because the documents have no promotional effect and cannot be considered marketing materials.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Cole, Filed On: February 23, 2024, Case #: 1:20cv918, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: patent, injunction
J. Boyle denies a major consumer electronics producer’s motion for a temporary restraining order and anti-suit injunction after a European competitor brought patent infringement allegations against it. The producer, in a counterclaim, seeks the injunction to stop its competitor from implementing injunction orders in Colombia and Brazil, preventing the producer from selling its products in those countries. However, the producer fails to sufficiently evidence that entering a global licensing agreement with its competitor would resolve the underlying infringement claims.
Court: USDC Eastern District of North Carolina, Judge: Boyle, Filed On: February 14, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv569, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: patent, Technology, injunction
J. Stoll finds that the district court properly denied a glucose monitor manufacturer a preliminary injunction in this patent infringement complaint because the company failed to demonstrate it would suffer irreparable harm if denied the injunction. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Stoll, Filed On: January 3, 2024, Case #: 2023-1795, Categories: patent, injunction
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Rowland grants the plaintiff farm equipment manufacturer’s motion to apply a permanent injunction against the defendant farm equipment manufacturer, barring the defendant from marketing a modular storage bin sweep whose design the plaintiff says violated the patent on its own version of the sweep. The court also alternatively grants and denies multiple miscellaneous post-trial motions from both parties, before entering judgment in the plaintiff’s favor and terminating the case.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Rowland, Filed On: September 7, 2023, Case #: 1:16cv2212, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: Agriculture, patent, injunction
J. Newey finds a lower court properly dismissed a drug manufacturer's motion for injunction concerning patent infringement claims against other drug manufacturers. The drug manufacturer argued that the secretary of health erred in deciding that it engaged in competition law infringement when it obtained injunctions against other companies who sought to sell the cardiovascular treatment drug. However, the secretary of health sufficiently showed in court that the patent lacks novelty. Affirmed.
Court: Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, Judge: Newey, Filed On: June 30, 2023, Case #: CA-2022-740, Categories: Health Care, patent, injunction